Changes for veterans are only a good first step

Veterans have been airing their concerns, but in fairness to the new veterans ombudsman, we need to consider his position, which is presented here. BONNIE

By Guy Parent, Citizen Special November 27, 2010 6:05 AM

The announcement made by the Veterans Affairs Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn on Nov. 17 regarding proposed legislation to improve the New Veterans Charter provides some optimism that there is a new willingness to address long-standing issues identified by veterans. It is a beginning, a good first step but, as we all know, the devil is in the details.

The most important question that we need to ask ourselves when considering the proposed changes is: Do they help veterans?

To me, the answer is a cautious yes. The announcement, totalling $2 billion, is recognition by Canada’s federal government that all is not right with the current veterans’ benefits system. It represents a willingness to begin a much needed ongoing change process.

That in itself is a step forward. Will the proposed changes address all the issues that have been raised? No, they won’t, and until we know all of the details, many questions will remain.

On the positive side, the improvements to the Permanent Impairment Allowance are welcome as the changes appear to address the unforeseen gap created when a veteran was receiving benefits under both the Pension Act and the New Veterans Charter.

With more than 3,500 veterans becoming eligible for this over the next five years, this is a step forward. As well, raising the minimum pre-tax income to $40,000 per year is a major improvement and will have an immediate effect for more than 2,000 of our most financially vulnerable veterans. In addition, the $1,000 per month for life for seriously injured veterans unable to work again is good news.

However, other details need to be addressed:

Lump sum payment The decision to offer flexible choices to a veteran as to whether to receive the lump sum disability award for pain and suffering as a single payment or as payments spread out over time is progress. Whether the intent of this initiative will be effective depends on how the interest rate is to be calculated and applied, and the type of financial counselling provided to the recipient. Without serious thought on these details, the intent may not be achieved.

In addition, veterans who choose to receive payments spread out over time must realize that they are giving the government of Canada legal authority to manage their money.

Finally, the question remains: Is the lump sum payment — with its maximum payout of $276,000 and average payout of $40,000 — enough when considered in combination with the other proposed changes? This needs to be addressed because veterans are concerned that currently those who fall under the New Veterans Charter receive less than veterans who fall under the old Pension Act. Detailed analysis is needed to accurately answer this question.

Inequality of earnings loss benefit application

It would appear that eligibility for this benefit will include full-time Canadian Forces (CF) members, i.e. veterans with the CF Regular Force, Reserve Class C and long-term Class B service. However, it appears also that part-time CF members, i.e. Class A and short-term Class B service Veterans, will receive a minimum salary that is significantly less than $40,000 per year.

This flies in the face of the equality principle of “one veteran,” whereby all veterans are to be treated equally. Why is this group of service members being singled out, especially when part-time CF members can actually be impacted more significantly than their full-time colleagues because not only does an injury or sickness stop the part-time members from doing their military duties, it often results in the loss of their full-time civilian job or the stoppage of their education, in the case of a student.

As well, reservists build their skills and experience through part-time service that eventually allows them to meet and fill full-time military requirements. Part-time service is an accepted and necessary part of the process in maintaining the Canadian Forces readiness.

Earnings loss benefit and permanent impairment allowance ‘for life’

Clarification is needed here. Much is being said in the media about how the most seriously injured and sick veterans can have peace of mind as they will be receiving a minimum of $58,000 per year, which is a combination of the $40,000 Earnings Loss Benefit plus the improvements to the Permanent Impairment Allowance.

There is some confusion, however, as to whether this $58,000 is for life, although some parliamentarians have stated that “for life” is the intent. Based on the current legislation the Earnings Loss Benefit stops at age 65, so only $18,000 of the $58,000 will continue for life. This needs public clarification so everyone understands the exact intent trying to be achieved, especially since long-term financial stability is the key to having veterans support the New Veterans Charter.

In conclusion, despite not being perfect, the proposed changes represent the beginning of a much-needed process to work through the problem areas that have been identified by veterans and their families with diligence and vigour. However, there is risk that, by not addressing needed changes in a more comprehensive, holistic way, the proposed individual adjustments will not be sufficient for veterans and their families to truly come to embrace the New Veterans Charter as a positive step forward.

Guy Parent is Canada’s veterans ombudsman.
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen


About Bonnie Toews and John Christiansen

Bonnie's Blog Posts invite our readers and free spirits everywhere to share life's adventures with us. I talk about writing my novels, reading books, chatting with other writers and John's and my journeys around the world. We welcome your anecdotes to our experiences and discussions.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan vets, Canadian Armed Forces, federal government, Homecoming Vets, veterans' affairs, veterans' assistance programs and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Changes for veterans are only a good first step

  1. Bonnie Toews says:

    To balance ombudsman’s position, comments on Facebook:

    1. Guy parent, the new veterans ombudsman. Only 18000 dollars of the 58000 dollars proposed is life time… Mike Blais Rcr Cfds

    2. The ombudsman has a voice. Only a first step? Unforeseen hardships? How could they be unforeseen? I would suggest that they knew all along they were going to save forty million per year… They were foreseen, Guy, just ignored. Ignored now by not making any of this money retroactive. Mike Blais Rcr Cfds

    3. Another comment by Glen Clark on Facebook:

    As a Cabinet Minister, Blackburn collects $233,247 per year, or almost $20,000 per month from taxpayers. He feels that disabled veterans are only worth $4,000 per year.

    This conservative government, through it’s Veterans Charter, has screwe…d disabled veterans like no other government before, by switching from a monthly pension to a lump sum. Where is the opposition? Do they agree?

    One day, disabled veterans could receive a disability payment of $4,000 per month. If you were disabled the next day, you were given a lump sum which would likely equate to $4.000 per year. The lump sum is wrong: you can tweak it or complicate it to confuse us, but you are still screwing diasbled veterans to balance your books.

  2. Arturo Muney says:

    I’d be inclined to give blessing with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I really like reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to speak my mind!

  3. Paula says:

    I don’t like your template but your posts are quite great so I will check back! Also i can’t register to your rss feed! Any ideea why? My best wishes, Paula.

  4. Hrmm that was weird, my remark received eaten. Anyway I needed to say that it’s good to know that someone else also talked about this as I had trouble finding the same data elsewhere. This was the first place that told me the answer. Thanks.

  5. Thanks for the nice post. I have been browsing for hours, I don’t know why the article was not on the top of yahoo. Sometimes it feels like they don’t put the most relevant info at the top.

  6. Cool post very informative I just found your blog and read through a few posts although this is my first comment, i’ll be including it in my favorites and visit again for sure

  7. Annuaire says:

    Fantastic article! I’ll subscribe correct now wth my feedreader software package!…

  8. Leisa Helman says:

    I’m still learning from you, while I’m improving myself. I definitely liked reading all that is written on your website.Keep the posts coming. I liked it!

  9. cliquez ici says:

    Hi! Your article rocks and is really a very good understand!…

  10. Emjoyed reading this blog, just wanted to say thank you

  11. mutuelle says:

    This website is awesome. I constantly come across something new & different right here. Thank you for that data.

  12. Fantastic article! I’ll subscribe correct now wth my feedreader software package!…

  13. Many thanks for a fantastic and topical report We genuinely appreciate all of the diligence that went to the publishing.

  14. news says:

    This web site is really a walk-through for all of the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely discover it.

  15. What youre saying is completely true. I know that everybody must say the same thing, but I just think that you put it in a way that everyone can understand. I also love the images you put in here. They fit so well with what youre trying to say. Im sure youll reach so many people with what youve got to say.

  16. seotons says:

    Fantastic article! I’ll subscribe correct now wth my feedreader software package!…

  17. seotons says:

    I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)……

  18. In total, it took me approximately 15 minutes to find this awesome post. Thank you very much.

  19. site says:

    WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. ;)…

  20. You may have not intended to do so, but I think you have managed to express the state of mind that a lot of people are in. The sense of wanting to help, but not knowing how or where, is something a lot of us are going through.

  21. Thats an alright observation!!

  22. Very good written post. It will be supportive to anybody who employess it, as well as myself. Keep doing what you are doing – looking forward to more posts.

  23. Found you weblog by way of yahoo I should say I m impressed with your posts!

  24. Definitely, what a magnificent website and informative posts, I surely will bookmark your website.All the Best!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s