NEW SERIES: The Canada Our Vets Want to Build — Their Fight for Rights and Compassionate Treatment POST EIGHTEEN


Pic for WikiProject Political parties and poli...

Image via Wikipedia

 

Kenneth H. Young talks about the common frustration Canadians feel about our voting system. BONNIE

No more taxation without representation.

by Kenneth H. Young, CD
 
The Numbers don’t add up, and maybe the 41% who do not vote have a point.
 
I know that what I am about to suggest will not sit well with most politicians who, when they win an election even with only 30% of the popular vote, take all their marbles and head off to Ottawa. I understand the concept of one person–one vote but what about the other 70% of the voters? There are inequities in our system. When the Bloc receive 10% of the Canada wide popular vote, they receive 49 seats, while the NDP with 18.2% of the votes only have 37, and the Green with 6.8% have none.
 
Now in all fairness, though many, especially the Bloc, would disagree with me, the Bloc should have no more than 10% of the seats in the House of Commons if we apply the principle of every vote is to be considered as  equal to any other vote. So, this means the Green with 6.8% should have 21 seats; the NDP with 18.2%,  56 seats; the Liberals with 26.2%,  81 seats; and the Conservatives with 37.6%. 116 seats. This is 305 of a possible total 308 seats, so the remaining 3 can go to Independents.
 
Now the above would be the results if we were to take the country as a whole.
 
A different approach which would break down provinces and take whatever number of seats which that province has and divide them up again by popular vote would change the numbers slightly and would have the added effect of not disenfranchising any voter regardless of which party voted for. For instance, in Alberta at the end of the last election, the Tories had all of the seats and so anybody who voted otherwise was not going to be represented in Ottawa, while in Newfoundland, zero Tories achieved a seat, even though they did in fact have a fair number of votes in the province.
 
The present system seems to divide the country by popular vote. It makes the west and this time the east look as if it were 100% behind or against one party, when nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is one party with close to one million votes has no representation at all and the number of seats which all parties have in the house of commons does not represent the Votes they received. Some have more seats than their voted share, others have much less and some none of their fair share.
 
Is it any wonder why 41% of the voters stay home and don’t bother to vote? Is it any wonder that the 41% feel that their vote won’t and in fact can’t make any difference?
 
Yes, I know that achieving a majority would be extremely difficult. After all when was the last time any party received 51% of the popular vote? And yes, Canadians would have to get used to and comfortable with the concept of Coalition, cooperation and understanding. And Yes, the House of commons would have to actually ask and answer questions with a mutual respect for the Canadian Parliament, because one would never know when they might need a vote or two to pass a bill–result: there would have to be a lot more free votes in Ottawa.
 
But most of all, Canada would  finally have a system where every vote does count equally in all parts of this country, where every vote matters and where every voter is represented in Ottawa. No more taxation without representation.

Kenneth H. Young CD

Canadian Veterans Advocacy
V.E.T.S.
Agent Orange Association of Canada

Advertisements

About Bonnie Toews and John Christiansen

Bonnie's Blog Posts invite our readers and free spirits everywhere to share life's adventures with us. I talk about writing my novels, reading books, chatting with other writers and John's and my journeys around the world. We welcome your anecdotes to our experiences and discussions.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan vets, Canadian Armed Forces, federal government, Homecoming Vets, veterans' affairs, veterans' assistance programs and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to NEW SERIES: The Canada Our Vets Want to Build — Their Fight for Rights and Compassionate Treatment POST EIGHTEEN

  1. Kenneth H Young CD says:

    Corrections

    This is 201 of a possible total 301 seats, so the remaining 100 can go to Independents.

    Should read 305 not 201
    and 301 should read 308
    and 100 should read 3

  2. Gary Goode says:

    Once again we can give thanks to Mr. Young for explaining something in such a way that even a preschooler could understand. There are any number of variables that could effect the outcome of an election no matter what voting system is being used, but there is one veritable that I defy anyone to explain.

    When we seriously consider the reasons for this election we are forced to take stock of the moral and integral values of Canada’s voting public and what their real values stand for, because even after Stephan Harper and his WESTERN ALLIANCE form of conservatism is found in contempt of parliament for the first time in Canadian history we find there is no shortage of supporters who will continue to vote for Stephan Harper.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s